NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 168.3GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Mobile 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1543MHz vs 1395MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+80%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Mobile
5.53 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
1328 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
1543 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
14
3584
Shading Units
1792
224
TMUs
112
64
ROPs
64
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
6 MB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.75 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
86.41 GFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.530 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
172.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GP104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
16 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
7.5
CUDA
6.1
6.8
Shader Model
6.4
