NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (1395MHz vs 771MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 115.2GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K5100M 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Lower TDP (100W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+322%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K5100M
2.369 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
1536
224
TMUs
128
64
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
24.67 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
98.69 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.369 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
98.69 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
100W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q5-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
