Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 78% (1395MHz vs 784MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 172.8GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K4200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 260W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4 +510%
12.86 TFLOPS
Quadro K4200
2.107 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1065 MHz
Base Clock
771 MHz
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
784 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s

Render Config

72
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
4608
Shading Units
1344
288
TMUs
112
96
ROPs
32
576
Tensor Cores
-
72
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

133.9 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.95 GPixel/s
401.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
87.81 GTexel/s
25.71 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
12.86 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.107 TFLOPS
401.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
87.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GK104-850-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

260W
TDP
108W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.6
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy