NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 vs NVIDIA Quadro K3100M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 4 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K3100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 4 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 4
+822%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K3100M
1.084 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jul 2013
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
768
224
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
32
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.30 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
45.18 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1084 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.18 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK104
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N15E-Q1-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
