NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
+1648%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
