NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 1800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 38.40GB/s)
3520 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (59W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
+5581%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1800
0.176 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Mar 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
768MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
38.40GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
8
3584
Shading Units
64
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
12
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
48 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
176.0 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
59W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
G94
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
G94 GL-U
Turing
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
65 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.1
6.8
Shader Model
4.0
