NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (672.0GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
3536 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
+9158%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Apr 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
6
3584
Shading Units
48
224
TMUs
16
64
ROPs
8
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GT216
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Turing
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
1.2
6.8
Shader Model
4.1
