NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 vs Intel Arctic Sound-M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 2 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound-M 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 672.0GB/s)
4608 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 2
9.999 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound M
+47%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
672.0GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
8192
224
TMUs
256
64
ROPs
128
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
6 MB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
-
Turing
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
12 nm
Process Size
10 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
8 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.8
Shader Model
6.6
