NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 16GB VRAM GRID RTX T10 16 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID RTX T10 16 's Advantages
Boost Clock1395MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (604.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID RTX T10 16
+1648%
9.999 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1065 MHz
Base Clock
-
1395 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1575 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
16GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
604.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
56
SM Count
-
3584
Shading Units
384
224
TMUs
32
64
ROPs
16
448
Tensor Cores
-
56
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
89.28 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.960 GPixel/s
312.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.84 GTexel/s
20.00 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
9.999 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
572.2 GFLOPS
312.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
23.84 GFLOPS
Board Design
150W
TDP
55W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
TU102
GPU Name
GK107
TU102-875-A1
GPU Variant
N14P-Q3-A2
Turing
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
28 nm
18.6 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
754 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
7.5
CUDA
3.0
6.8
Shader Model
5.1
