Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q vs NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q and 32GB VRAM Tesla PG500 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla PG500 216 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1380MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1133GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID M60 2Q
4.825 TFLOPS
Tesla PG500 216 +192%
14.13 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Nov 2019
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

557 MHz
Base Clock
1260 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1106 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
1133GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
80
-
Compute Units
-
2048
Shading Units
5120
128
TMUs
320
64
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
640
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
6 MB

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
176.6 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
441.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
28.26 TFLOPS
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.13 TFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
7.066 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
GV100
-
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Volta
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
21.1 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
815 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
7.0
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy