NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID M60 2Q and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M60 2Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 160.4GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M60 2Q
+262%
4.825 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
557 MHz
Base Clock
-
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
2048
Shading Units
512
128
TMUs
64
64
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
150.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
150.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
2.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
