NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M6 8Q
+157%
2.218 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
96
TMUs
24
64
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.21 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
69.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
69.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
45W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GM107
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
5.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
