NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M6 8Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M6 8Q 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 89.60GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K3000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 100W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M6 8Q
+194%
2.218 TFLOPS
Quadro K3000M
0.753 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2015
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.4GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
576
96
TMUs
48
64
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
46.21 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.848 GPixel/s
69.31 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
31.39 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.218 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
753.4 GFLOPS
69.31 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.39 GFLOPS
Board Design
100W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM204
GPU Name
GK104
GM204-995-A1
GPU Variant
N14E-Q1-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
5.2
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1
