NVIDIA GRID M40 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M40 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
Lower TDP (50W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+67%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
793.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
24.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF110
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
