NVIDIA GRID M40 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M40 and 0GB VRAM Quadro P2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M40 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1291MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M40
0.793 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 Mobile
+275%
2.974 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Feb 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1291 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1291 MHz
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
384
Shading Units
1152
32
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.53 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
41.31 GPixel/s
33.06 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.95 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
46.48 GFLOPS
793.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.974 TFLOPS
24.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
92.95 GFLOPS
Board Design
50W
TDP
75W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GP106
-
-
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
