NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
592 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+1341%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Jan 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
640
Shading Units
48
40
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
35W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
4.1
