NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID M3 3020 and 6GB VRAM Quadro 6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M3 3020 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 6000 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (143.4GB/s vs 83.20GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M3 3020
+62%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro 6000
1.028 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
Dec 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
747 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
143.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
640
Shading Units
448
40
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
204W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
