NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
632 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID M10 8Q
+7861%
1.672 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2016
Release Date
May 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1306 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1300 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
83.20GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
640
Shading Units
8
40
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
20.90 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
52.24 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.672 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
52.24 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
23W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
G98
GM107-570-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
