Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

NVIDIA GRID K520Q vs NVIDIA Quadro VX 200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q and 512MB VRAM Quadro VX 200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
1424 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro VX 200 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K520Q +808%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro VX 200
0.252 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2014
Release Date
Jan 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro VX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
14
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
112
128
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
252.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G92
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy