NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2050
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 and 3GB VRAM Tesla M2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K340 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
NVIDIA Tesla M2050 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (148.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Tesla M2050
+40%
1.03 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2011
GRID
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
773 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
148.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
384
Shading Units
448
32
TMUs
56
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.10 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1030 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
515.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
225W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF100
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
