NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000M
+91%
1.405 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Dec 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1098 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
640
32
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.57 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
43.92 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1405 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.92 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
N16P-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
