NVIDIA GRID K340 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K340 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K340
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+384%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
32
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GK110B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
