NVIDIA GRID K280Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K280Q and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K280Q 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 41.60GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
Lower TDP (62W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K280Q
+376%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
62W
550 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
