NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA RTX A5500
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
8704 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
RTX A5500
+1389%
34.1 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2022
GRID
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
80
1536
Shading Units
10240
128
TMUs
320
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
230W
550 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7
