NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3200 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P3200 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1404MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro P3200 Max Q
+119%
5.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2018
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1139 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1404 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
1536
Shading Units
1792
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
89.86 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
157.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
78.62 GFLOPS
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.032 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
157.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
75W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GP104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
