Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro M6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 12GB VRAM Quadro M6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro M6000 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1114MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (317.4GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro M6000 +198%
6.844 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Mar 2015
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
988 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1114 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
317.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
106.9 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
213.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.844 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
213.9 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GM200
-
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
601 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
250W
550 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy