NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K620
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro K620 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K620 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+165%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K620
0.863 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jul 2014
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1058 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.98 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-850-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
