NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 4GB VRAM Quadro K5000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Released 10 months late
NVIDIA Quadro K5000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (172.8GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (122W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+5%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K5000 Mac Edition
2.169 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1350 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
172.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1536
128
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.59 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
90.37 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.169 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
90.37 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
122W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
