NVIDIA GRID K260Q vs NVIDIA Quadro 4100
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM GRID K260Q and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K260Q 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 57.02GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K260Q
+6%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 4100
2.142 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
57.02GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
1344
128
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
22.32 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.26 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.142 TFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.26 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
35W
550 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK104
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
