Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 370M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 9.600GB/s)
1528 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 370M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 225W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K200 +10304%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 370M
0.022 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Aug 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-II

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
9.600GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1536
Shading Units
8
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB

Theoretical Performance

23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.200 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
22.40 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
G98
-
GPU Variant
NB9M-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Board Design

225W
TDP
20W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy