NVIDIA GRID K200 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K200 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K200 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K200
+395%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Nov 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
150W
550 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
2x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GT200B
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
