NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K1000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+602%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro K1000M
0.326 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.400 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
326.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
13.60 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
45W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GK107
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N14P-Q1-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.175
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
