NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 5000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 5000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (100W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+341%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 5000M
0.518 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
600 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
1536
Shading Units
320
128
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.100 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
518.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
225W
TDP
100W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N10E-GLM5-A3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
