NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 1792MB VRAM Quadro 4000 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1792GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 89.86GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 4000 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (142W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+370%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000 Mac Edition
0.486 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jun 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1792MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
89.86GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
1536
Shading Units
256
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.600 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
486.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
142W
550 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF100
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
