NVIDIA GRID K2 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K2 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 2000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K2
+442%
2.289 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000M
0.422 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
1536
Shading Units
192
128
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.84 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
95.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.289 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
422.4 GFLOPS
95.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
35.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
225W
TDP
55W
550 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK104
GPU Name
GF106
GK104-895-A2
GPU Variant
N12P-Q3
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.2.175
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
5.1
