NVIDIA GRID K160Q vs NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GRID K160Q and 8GB VRAM GRID M10 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K160Q 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M10 8Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1306MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K160Q
0.326 TFLOPS
GRID M10 8Q
+412%
1.672 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2016
GRID
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1033 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1306 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.90 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.24 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.672 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
52.24 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
225W
300 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GM107
-
GPU Variant
GM107-570-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
