NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1785MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.1GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Mobile
+1021%
3.656 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
May 2019
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1575 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1785 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
2001 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
128.1GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
57.12 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
114.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.311 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.656 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
114.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
60W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
TU117
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
