Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (100W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M +111%
0.691 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
192
Shading Units
384
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
100W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
-
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net