NVIDIA GRID K100 vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000D
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro 2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 8 months late
NVIDIA Quadro 2000D 's Advantages
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (41.60GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (62W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 2000D
+47%
0.48 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Oct 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
41.60GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
40.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
62W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF106
-
GPU Variant
GF106-875-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
