NVIDIA GRID K100 vs Intel Arctic Sound M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM GRID K100 and 16GB VRAM Intel Arctic Sound M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K100 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 500W)
Intel Arctic Sound M 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
8000 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K100
0.326 TFLOPS
Intel Arctic Sound M
+4424%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2013
Release Date
Jan 2022
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
8192
16
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
115.2 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
230.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
3.686 TFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
500W
300 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
-
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.6
