NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000
+829%
3.031 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2017
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GP106
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4
