NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 11.12GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 295 's Advantages
Lower TDP (23W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
+1452%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 295
0.021 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
May 2009
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
695 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
11.12GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
16
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
23W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G98
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
