NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
+181%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2010
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.400 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.800 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
116.2 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
35W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GT216
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
N10P-GLM
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
