NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 3600M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 3600M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
Lower TDP (70W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
+103%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 3600M
0.16 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
8
192
Shading Units
64
16
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
70W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G92
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
NB8E-GLM3
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
