NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.51GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
+386%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Sep 2008
GRID
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
16
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
130W
TDP
42W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G84
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
