NVIDIA GRID K1 vs NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 2GB VRAM Quadro 3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
48 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 130W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 3000M
+32%
0.432 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
GRID
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
192
Shading Units
240
16
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.500 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
432.0 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
36.00 GFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
75W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
GF104
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
