NVIDIA GRID K1 vs Intel Arctic Sound 1T
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM GRID K1 and 16GB VRAM Arctic Sound 1T to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID K1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (130W vs 350W)
Intel Arctic Sound 1T 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1229GB/s vs 28.51GB/s)
5952 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID K1
0.326 TFLOPS
Arctic Sound 1T
+3292%
11.06 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2013
Release Date
Jan 2021
GRID
Generation
Xe Graphics
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
891 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
28.51GB/s
Bandwidth
1229GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
192
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
172.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.765 TFLOPS
Board Design
130W
TDP
350W
300 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
Arctic Sound
GK107-450-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Generation 12.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
28 nm
Process Size
10 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
190 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5
