NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (48GB vs 24GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 432.8GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 64% (1645MHz vs 1005MHz)
Lower TDP (250W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+9%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000
12.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Oct 2016
GRID
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
1506 MHz
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
24GB
HBM2e
Memory Type
GDDR5X
6144bit
Memory Bus
384bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
30
6912
Shading Units
3840
432
TMUs
240
192
ROPs
96
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
48 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
250W
800 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
16 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (12_1)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
8.0
CUDA
6.1
N/A
Shader Model
6.7
