NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 290 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6896 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290 's Advantages
Lower TDP (21W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+47796%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 290
0.029 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Oct 2007
GRID
Generation
Quadro NVS
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
256MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR2
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
2
6912
Shading Units
16
432
TMUs
8
192
ROPs
4
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
48 MB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.836 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.672 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.38 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
400W
TDP
21W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
G86
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
80 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
N/A
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
8.0
CUDA
1.1
N/A
Shader Model
4.0
