NVIDIA GRID A100B vs NVIDIA Quadro 410
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 48GB VRAM GRID A100B and 512MB VRAM Quadro 410 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GRID A100B 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 14.26GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 410 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 400W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GRID A100B
+5025%
13.89 TFLOPS
Quadro 410
0.271 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2020
Release Date
Aug 2012
GRID
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 4.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
900 MHz
Base Clock
-
1005 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1215 MHz
Memory Clock
891 MHz
Memory
48GB
Memory Size
512MB
HBM2e
Memory Type
DDR3
6144bit
Memory Bus
64bit
1866GB/s
Bandwidth
14.26GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
108
SM Count
-
6912
Shading Units
192
432
TMUs
16
192
ROPs
8
432
Tensor Cores
-
-
-
-
192 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
48 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
193.0 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.824 GPixel/s
434.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
11.30 GTexel/s
55.57 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
13.89 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
271.1 GFLOPS
6.947 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.30 GFLOPS
Board Design
400W
TDP
38W
800 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GA100
GPU Name
GK107
-
GPU Variant
GK107-810-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
7 nm
Process Size
28 nm
54.2 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
826 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²
Graphics Features
N/A
DirectX
12 (11_0)
N/A
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
8.0
CUDA
3.0
N/A
Shader Model
5.1
